Joey Dorsey /// Stats /// Cleaning the Glass

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

								Offense										Defense
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Diff		Exp W	Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate		Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate
On Court	14-15	30.9	HOU	763	66	+1.7	46	73	107.7	59	49.8%	19	16.9%	97	33.6%	58	20.6	48	106.0	23	51.3%	95	18.2%	18	30.3%	19	23.3
PG
SG
SF
PF				1%		-9.1	17		90.9		55.6%		18.2%		0.0%		0.0		100.0		41.7%		20.0%		50.0%		0.0
C				99%	65	+1.8	46	64	107.8	50	49.8%	17	16.9%	96	33.8%	49	20.8	51	106.1	31	51.4%	93	18.2%	28	30.1%	29	23.5
On Court	10-11	26.9	TOR	482	25	-6.6	24	9	99.9	15	47.2%	5	18.3%	98	34.9%	6	18.2	59	106.5	27	51.5%	83	16.9%	59	28.4%	41	24.0
PG
SG
SF
PF				2%		-61.0	0		85.7		36.4%		7.1%		11.1%		36.4		146.7		64.3%		0.0%		16.7%		28.6
C				98%	25	-5.7	26	12	100.1	17	47.4%	5	18.5%	96	35.3%	7	18.0	62	105.8	38	51.2%	78	17.1%	55	28.5%	49	23.9
On Court	09-10	25.9	SAC	52		+0.8	43		119.4		52.9%		12.2%		37.5%		30.2		118.6		53.0%		14.4%		25.5%		31.0
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		+0.8	43		119.4		52.9%		12.2%		37.5%		30.2		118.6		53.0%		14.4%		25.5%		31.0
On Court	09-10	25.9	HOU	44		+26.0	79		121.3		53.8%		19.1%		51.2%		27.5		95.3		46.7%		15.1%		20.5%		16.0
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		+26.0	79		121.3		53.8%		19.1%		51.2%		27.5		95.3		46.7%		15.1%		20.5%		16.0

Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Usage		PSA		AST%		AST:Usg		TOV%
On Court	14-15	30.9	HOU	763	2	10.2%	19	98.2	13	3.9%	30	0.38	7	19.6%
PG
SG
SF
PF				1%		4.5%		200.0		0.0%		0.00		0.0%
C				99%	2	10.2%	15	97.5	15	3.9%	34	0.38	8	19.6%
On Court	10-11	26.9	TOR	482	33	14.1%	36	102.6	65	7.3%	70	0.52	7	23.8%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				98%	38	14.2%	34	102.6	59	7.1%	67	0.50	8	23.3%
On Court	09-10	25.9	SAC	52		13.4%		85.7		0.0%		0.00		12.9%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		13.4%		85.7		0.0%		0.00		12.9%
On Court	09-10	25.9	HOU	44		13.3%		100.0		6.1%		0.46		27.6%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		13.3%		100.0		6.1%		0.46		27.6%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		2P%		FT%		ASTD% All		ASTD% Rim		ASTD% Mid		ASTD% Three
On Court	14-15	30.9	HOU	763	75	54.6%	75	54.6%	0	27.1%	38	73%	18	74%	61	67%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF				1%		100.0%		100.0%				100%		100%
C				99%	57	54.3%	54	54.3%	0	27.1%	37	73%	22	73%	57	67%	0
On Court	10-11	26.9	TOR	482	65	52.7%	67	52.7%	3	43.6%	87	54%	81	52%	2	100%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				98%	61	52.7%	62	52.7%	4	43.6%	83	54%	80	52%	2	100%	0
On Court	09-10	25.9	SAC	52		44.4%		44.4%		40.0%		25%		33%		0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		44.4%		44.4%		40.0%		25%		33%		0%
On Court	09-10	25.9	HOU	44		50.0%		50.0%		50.0%		60%		60%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		50.0%		50.0%		50.0%		60%		60%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							% of Shot Attempts
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three		Non Corner		All Three
On Court	14-15	30.9	HOU	763	75	54.6%	96	87%	18	12%	11	1%	5	13%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
PG
SG
SF
PF				1%		100.0%		100%		0%		0%		0%		0%		0%		0%
C				99%	57	54.3%	94	84%	17	14%	15	2%	7	16%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
On Court	10-11	26.9	TOR	482	65	52.7%	99	93%	6	7%	0	0%	1	7%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				98%	61	52.7%	98	92%	8	8%	0	0%	2	8%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
On Court	09-10	25.9	SAC	52		44.4%		67%		33%		0%		33%		0%		0%		0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		44.4%		67%		33%		0%		33%		0%		0%		0%
On Court	09-10	25.9	HOU	44		50.0%		90%		10%		0%		10%		0%		0%		0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		50.0%		90%		10%		0%		10%		0%		0%		0%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							FG%
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three	Non Corner	All Three
On Court	14-15	30.9	HOU	763	75	54.6%	36	59%	22	33%	3	0%	13	30%
PG
SG
SF
PF				1%		100.0%		100%
C				99%	57	54.3%	27	59%	31	33%	4	0%	18	30%
On Court	10-11	26.9	TOR	482	65	52.7%	15	55%	24	29%	0		14	29%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				98%	61	52.7%	13	55%	25	29%	0		18	29%
On Court	09-10	25.9	SAC	52		44.4%		50%		33%				33%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		44.4%		50%		33%				33%
On Court	09-10	25.9	HOU	44		50.0%		56%		0%				0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		50.0%		56%		0%				0%

Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	FT%		SFLD%		FFLD%		AND1%
On Court	14-15	30.9	HOU	763	0	27.1%	68	14.7%	55	1.7%	11	9.1%
PG
SG
SF
PF				1%				0.0%		0.0%
C				99%	0	27.1%	56	14.8%	47	1.7%	16	9.1%
On Court	10-11	26.9	TOR	482	3	43.6%	90	24.1%	10	0.7%	13	10.7%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				98%	4	43.6%	86	24.1%	6	0.8%	16	10.7%
On Court	09-10	25.9	SAC	52		40.0%		25.0%		2.6%		0.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		40.0%		25.0%		2.6%		0.0%
On Court	09-10	25.9	HOU	44		50.0%		9.1%		0.9%		0.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		50.0%		9.1%		0.9%		0.0%

Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	BLK%		STL%		FOUL%		fgOR%		fgDR%		ftOR%		ftDR%
On Court	14-15	30.9	HOU	763	51	1.6%	96	2.1%	4	7.0%	89	12.3%	66	18.9%	26	1.5%	59	32.7%
PG
SG
SF
PF				1%		0.0%		0.0%		0.0%		0.0%		0.0%				0.0%
C				99%	32	1.6%	98	2.1%	5	7.1%	85	12.3%	64	19.1%	41	1.5%	54	33.3%
On Court	10-11	26.9	TOR	482	57	2.0%	99	2.2%	20	6.6%	99	16.2%	81	20.3%	42	2.0%	88	42.2%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				98%	50	2.1%	98	2.3%	23	6.7%	99	16.4%	74	20.1%	44	2.1%	86	42.2%
On Court	09-10	25.9	SAC	52		1.0%		0.9%		6.0%		11.6%		23.3%		0.0%		60.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		1.0%		0.9%		6.0%		11.6%		23.3%		0.0%		60.0%
On Court	09-10	25.9	HOU	44		1.2%		1.8%		4.6%		21.4%		23.3%		0.0%		0.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		1.2%		1.8%		4.6%		21.4%		23.3%		0.0%		0.0%

Guide to understanding this table