Dereck Lively II /// Stats /// Cleaning the Glass

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

								Offense										Defense
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Diff		Exp W	Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate		Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate
On Court	24-25	20.7	DAL	158	81	+9.7	64	55	114.4	43	53.8%	74	12.9%	43	26.8%	23	17.5	93	104.7	93	49.5%	70	15.9%	37	29.3%	23	22.5
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	82	+9.7	64	55	114.4	33	53.8%	69	12.9%	42	26.8%	25	17.5	93	104.7	95	49.5%	69	15.9%	31	29.3%	22	22.5
On Court	23-24	19.7	DAL	1288	81	+5.5	54	94	122.3	98	59.4%	94	11.8%	36	25.4%	38	17.9	43	116.8	41	55.5%	27	13.0%	39	27.4%	92	15.5
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	81	+5.5	54	92	122.3	97	59.4%	90	11.8%	35	25.4%	37	17.9	49	116.8	47	55.5%	31	13.0%	40	27.4%	91	15.5

Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Usage		PSA		AST%		AST:Usg		TOV%
On Court	24-25	20.7	DAL	158	33	14.1%	89	138.3	81	15.6%	87	1.11	30	15.5%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	33	14.1%	85	138.3	84	15.6%	87	1.11	38	15.5%
On Court	23-24	19.7	DAL	1288	13	10.8%	97	145.8	13	6.0%	35	0.56	28	15.6%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	8	10.8%	96	145.8	11	6.0%	32	0.56	31	15.6%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		2P%			FT%		ASTD% All		ASTD% Rim		ASTD% Mid		ASTD% Three
On Court	24-25	20.7	DAL	158	94	69.2%	94	69.2%			57.9%	11	89%	1	95%	55	71%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	95	69.2%	93	69.2%			57.9%	7	89%	2	95%	67	71%	0
On Court	23-24	19.7	DAL	1288	99	74.4%	99	75.2%	0.0%	5	49.4%	25	81%	6	80%	21	88%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	99	74.4%	98	75.2%	0.0%	6	49.4%	22	81%	9	80%	25	88%	0

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							% of Shot Attempts
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three		Non Corner		All Three
On Court	24-25	20.7	DAL	158	94	69.2%	73	71%	82	29%	0	0%	72	29%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	95	69.2%	64	66%	84	34%	0	0%	76	34%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
On Court	23-24	19.7	DAL	1288	99	74.4%	94	84%	28	15%	17	1%	17	15%	26	1%	0	0%	18	1%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	99	74.4%	93	83%	29	16%	21	1%	23	17%	29	1%	0	0%	22	1%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							FG%
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three		Non Corner	All Three
On Court	24-25	20.7	DAL	158	94	69.2%	89	80%	82	54%	0		83	54%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	95	69.2%	89	80%	76	54%	0		82	54%
On Court	23-24	19.7	DAL	1288	99	74.4%	93	80%	77	49%	96	100%	85	51%		0%			0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	99	74.4%	94	80%	74	49%	97	100%	84	51%		0%			0%

Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	FT%		SFLD%		FFLD%		AND1%
On Court	24-25	20.7	DAL	158		57.9%	93	21.7%	28	1.1%	66	30.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		57.9%	93	21.7%	16	1.1%	67	30.0%
On Court	23-24	19.7	DAL	1288	5	49.4%	50	12.0%	41	1.1%	68	28.2%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	6	49.4%	41	12.0%	32	1.1%	66	28.2%

Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	BLK%		STL%		FOUL%		fgOR%		fgDR%		ftOR%		ftDR%
On Court	24-25	20.7	DAL	158	57	2.0%	59	1.4%	6	5.8%	86	12.8%	63	20.0%	92	16.7%	19	11.1%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	49	2.0%	64	1.4%	11	5.8%	80	12.8%	49	20.0%	91	16.7%	20	11.1%
On Court	23-24	19.7	DAL	1288	85	2.9%	52	1.1%	32	4.2%	79	11.0%	54	17.4%	83	5.4%	59	30.9%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	78	2.9%	55	1.1%	44	4.2%	75	11.0%	43	17.4%	79	5.4%	50	30.9%

Guide to understanding this table