Kira Lewis Jr.
6'3" point23.6 years old #13 pick in 2020
Profile Positions On/Off Stats Game Logs Lineups Trends

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Offense Defense
Year Age Team MIN Diff Exp W Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate
On Court 23-24 22.6 UTA 105 1 -22.1 5 6 104.6 11 50.5% 3 17.1% 19 24.1% 46 18.5 2 126.7 7 58.5% 16 12.4% 1 34.9% 87 16.5
PG 74% -13.9 12 106.4 51.8% 19.1% 29.1% 14.9 120.3 53.0% 12.7% 36.6% 19.9
SG 26% -44.1 0 100.0 46.9% 11.9% 10.3% 29.2 144.1 73.6% 11.9% 29.2% 7.3
SF
PF
C
On Court 23-24 22.6 NOP 103 14 -11.4 15 1 99.5 1 45.4% 80 12.7% 15 23.5% 96 25.0 88 110.9 98 50.5% 96 17.1% 22 28.8% 2 27.3
PG 93% -10.2 17 102.5 46.2% 12.2% 24.3% 24.9 112.8 51.8% 17.9% 30.0% 28.6
SG 7% -24.2 1 62.5 31.8% 18.8% 12.5% 27.3 86.7 36.7% 6.7% 18.2% 13.3
SF
PF
C
On Court 22-23 21.6 NOP 170 100 +16.0 72 98 122.9 93 57.8% 94 12.2% 15 23.4% 95 25.2 98 106.9 99 50.3% 76 15.3% 55 26.7% 28 22.5
PG 92% 100 +21.8 76 99 127.0 96 59.7% 96 11.3% 12 22.5% 95 26.4 96 105.3 96 50.0% 79 15.8% 46 27.2% 23 23.2
SG 8% -53.9 0 74.1 35.4% 22.2% 31.2% 12.5 128.0 53.8% 8.0% 21.4% 15.4
SF
PF
C
On Court 21-22 20.6 NOP 302 2 -20.9 5 0 93.7 0 45.0% 1 18.7% 78 28.7% 2 13.0 34 114.6 55 53.3% 32 13.1% 72 24.8% 23 21.7
PG 100% 3 -20.9 5 1 93.7 0 45.0% 2 18.7% 75 28.7% 3 13.0 40 114.6 55 53.3% 36 13.1% 70 24.8% 29 21.7
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 20-21 19.6 NOP 818 54 -0.3 40 49 111.6 21 51.3% 38 14.3% 90 28.8% 89 22.1 64 111.9 41 54.7% 47 13.7% 90 22.0% 34 20.5
PG 100% 53 -0.3 40 47 111.6 23 51.3% 38 14.3% 92 28.8% 87 22.1 62 111.9 36 54.7% 51 13.7% 86 22.0% 33 20.5
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN Usage PSA AST% AST:Usg TOV%
On Court 23-24 22.6 UTA 105 52 19.1% 34 105.4 45 20.3% 60 1.06 36 12.9%
PG 74% 19.8% 120.7 21.6% 1.09 11.1%
SG 26% 16.9% 50.0 16.7% 0.98 19.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 23-24 22.6 NOP 103 19 17.8% 0 70.3 7 15.2% 14 0.85 74 9.4%
PG 93% 17.3% 70.6 15.9% 0.92 7.8%
SG 7% 25.0% 66.7 0.0% 0.00 25.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 22-23 21.6 NOP 170 24 20.1% 67 117.1 0 12.9% 0 0.64 93 9.1%
PG 92% 26 20.5% 76 119.4 0 12.8% 0 0.63 100 6.9%
SG 8% 16.1% 66.7 14.3% 0.89 40.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 21-22 20.6 NOP 302 48 22.5% 22 98.5 28 24.7% 40 1.10 26 15.0%
PG 100% 46 22.5% 22 98.5 26 24.7% 38 1.10 24 15.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 20-21 19.6 NOP 818 14 19.0% 7 95.2 14 19.7% 39 1.04 93 8.3%
PG 100% 14 19.0% 7 95.2 14 19.7% 39 1.04 93 8.3%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN eFG% 2P% 3P% FT% ASTD%
All		 ASTD%
Rim		 ASTD%
Mid		 ASTD%
Three
On Court 23-24 22.6 UTA 105 33 50.0% 98 58.3% 20.0% 71.4% 79 44% 22 60% 64 33% 97 50%
PG 74% 57.7% 60.0% 33.3% 71.4% 36% 50% 25% 50%
SG 26% 25.0% 50.0% 0.0% 100% 100% 100%
SF
PF
C
On Court 23-24 22.6 NOP 103 0 28.8% 2 38.1% 7.7% 87.5% 0 78% 0 75% 0 2 100%
PG 93% 30.6% 40.0% 8.3% 83.3% 78% 75% 100%
SG 7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 22-23 21.6 NOP 170 74 55.4% 54 51.2% 91 41.7% 83.3% 26 52% 63 25% 11 44% 15 90%
PG 92% 83 56.5% 65 52.6% 91 41.7% 83.3% 30 50% 78 18% 11 44% 13 90%
SG 8% 33.3% 33.3% 100% 100%
SF
PF
C
On Court 21-22 20.6 NOP 302 28 47.6% 78 51.9% 9 27.1% 88.9% 16 57% 2 56% 4 38% 20 85%
PG 100% 28 47.6% 78 51.9% 9 27.1% 88.9% 16 57% 2 56% 4 38% 22 85%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 20-21 19.6 NOP 818 7 44.6% 9 40.7% 26 34.0% 62 87.8% 18 53% 14 42% 18 36% 36 81%
PG 100% 7 44.6% 9 40.7% 29 34.0% 62 87.8% 18 53% 14 42% 18 36% 36 81%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
% of Shot Attempts
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid		 Long
Mid		 All
Mid		 Corner
Three		 Non
Corner		 All
Three
On Court 23-24 22.6 UTA 105 33 50.0% 64 27% 95 41% 24 5% 91 46% 15 5% 22 22% 9 27%
PG 74% 57.7% 27% 42% 8% 50% 4% 19% 23%
SG 26% 25.0% 12% 38% 0% 38% 12% 38% 50%
SF
PF
C
On Court 23-24 22.6 NOP 103 0 28.8% 93 47% 7 14% 23 6% 5 19% 77 11% 19 22% 35 33%
PG 93% 30.6% 42% 16% 6% 23% 13% 23% 35%
SG 7% 0.0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50%
SF
PF
C
On Court 22-23 21.6 NOP 170 74 55.4% 83 31% 39 23% 59 11% 41 34% 61 7% 30 27% 39 34%
PG 92% 83 56.5% 83 29% 26 19% 61 13% 37 32% 63 8% 39 31% 43 39%
SG 8% 33.3% 33% 67% 0% 67% 0% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 21-22 20.6 NOP 302 28 47.6% 66 30% 78 28% 24 6% 54 35% 74 9% 38 26% 42 35%
PG 100% 28 47.6% 78 30% 76 27% 24 6% 48 34% 74 10% 26 27% 38 36%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 20-21 19.6 NOP 818 7 44.6% 70 37% 45 23% 18 5% 30 28% 73 7% 45 27% 43 34%
PG 100% 7 44.6% 75 35% 52 24% 20 5% 32 30% 73 8% 45 28% 45 36%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
FG%
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid		 Long
Mid		 All
Mid		 Corner
Three		 Non
Corner		 All
Three
On Court 23-24 22.6 UTA 105 33 50.0% 57 62% 97 64% 3 0% 99 56% 0% 25% 20%
PG 74% 57.7% 57% 73% 0% 62% 0% 40% 33%
SG 26% 25.0% 100% 33% 33% 0% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 23-24 22.6 NOP 103 0 28.8% 30 57% 0 0% 5 0% 0 0% 0% 12% 8%
PG 93% 30.6% 62% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 9%
SG 7% 0.0% 0% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 22-23 21.6 NOP 170 74 55.4% 61 63% 4 29% 93 62% 35 41% 80% 21 32% 91 42%
PG 92% 83 56.5% 57 61% 4 33% 93 62% 61 45% 80% 21 32% 91 42%
SG 8% 33.3% 100% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 21-22 20.6 NOP 302 28 47.6% 92 68% 58 41% 14 25% 44 38% 33% 4 24% 4 27%
PG 100% 28 47.6% 90 68% 58 41% 14 25% 44 38% 33% 4 24% 4 27%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 20-21 19.6 NOP 818 7 44.6% 30 54% 14 28% 5 12% 7 25% 31 35% 38 34% 36 34%
PG 100% 7 44.6% 27 54% 14 28% 5 12% 7 25% 34 35% 35 34% 36 34%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN FT% SFLD% FFLD% AND1%
On Court 23-24 22.6 UTA 105 71.4% 84 10.8% 63 1.2% 57 25.0%
PG 74% 71.4% 13.8% 1.1% 25.0%
SG 26% 0.0% 1.6%
SF
PF
C
On Court 23-24 22.6 NOP 103 87.5% 88 13.5% 5 0.4% 91 40.0%
PG 93% 83.3% 11.8% 0.4% 50.0%
SG 7% 100.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 22-23 21.6 NOP 170 83.3% 63 10.0% 7 0.5% 78 28.6%
PG 92% 83.3% 65 10.4% 0 0.3% 80 28.6%
SG 8% 0.0% 3.2%
SF
PF
C
On Court 21-22 20.6 NOP 302 88.9% 12 3.1% 2 0.4% 56 25.0%
PG 100% 88.9% 12 3.1% 2 0.4% 56 25.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 20-21 19.6 NOP 818 62 87.8% 30 5.8% 11 0.8% 7 11.1%
PG 100% 62 87.8% 30 5.8% 11 0.8% 9 11.1%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN BLK% STL% FOUL% fgOR% fgDR% ftOR% ftDR%
On Court 23-24 22.6 UTA 105 0 0.0% 34 1.2% 97 1.6% 73 2.9% 7 5.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
PG 74% 0.0% 1.1% 1.1% 3.9% 6.2% 0.0% 0.0%
SG 26% 0.0% 1.6% 3.2% 0.0% 4.2% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 23-24 22.6 NOP 103 51 0.5% 72 1.7% 56 2.5% 7 0.9% 33 8.7% 100 14.3% 0 0.0%
PG 93% 0.5% 1.8% 2.7% 1.0% 7.6% 14.3% 0.0%
SG 7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 18.2%
SF
PF
C
On Court 22-23 21.6 NOP 170 24 0.3% 65 1.6% 2 5.0% 76 2.7% 78 12.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
PG 92% 0 0.0% 72 1.7% 0 5.4% 80 3.1% 61 11.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
SG 8% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.1% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 21-22 20.6 NOP 302 0 0.0% 44 1.5% 82 2.0% 38 1.8% 22 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
PG 100% 0 0.0% 44 1.5% 82 2.0% 36 1.8% 24 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
On Court 20-21 19.6 NOP 818 66 0.5% 64 1.8% 2 4.3% 14 1.2% 9 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
PG 100% 64 0.5% 66 1.8% 2 4.3% 14 1.2% 9 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
SG
SF
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
    It includes:
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent shooting by location
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent play context (transition/half court/putbacks)
Try Insider stats free for one week,
then just $5/month after that
Subscribe Now