Curtis Borchardt /// Stats /// Cleaning the Glass

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

								Offense										Defense
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Diff		Exp W	Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate		Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate
On Court	04-05	24.1	UTA	820	11	-9.7	17	13	98.4	10	44.8%	5	19.0%	97	36.2%	37	23.4	29	108.1	12	51.0%	71	16.7%	91	27.9%	15	30.3
PG
SG
SF
PF				0%		-100.0	0		100.0		50.0%		0.0%		0.0%		0.0		200.0		50.0%		0.0%		100.0%		0.0
C				100%	10	-9.6	18	12	98.4	9	44.8%	5	19.0%	96	36.2%	40	23.4	36	108.0	20	51.0%	70	16.7%	88	27.8%	23	30.4
On Court	03-04	23.1	UTA	248	19	-6.8	23	30	99.1	53	47.0%	0	22.0%	88	34.3%	95	27.8	23	105.9	4	51.0%	74	17.6%	96	26.7%	4	33.3
PG
SG
SF
PF				10%		+6.9	60		102.4		51.4%		26.8%		44.4%		17.1		95.6		35.2%		6.7%		32.3%		29.5
C				90%	14	-8.2	20	30	98.8	48	46.6%	1	21.5%	83	33.3%	89	29.0	19	107.0	2	53.1%	86	18.8%	97	25.8%	7	33.9

Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Usage		PSA		AST%		AST:Usg		TOV%
On Court	04-05	24.1	UTA	820	36	12.1%	41	119.0	81	9.8%	94	0.81	14	24.5%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	38	12.1%	30	119.0	83	9.8%	93	0.81	14	24.5%
On Court	03-04	23.1	UTA	248	50	13.5%	20	107.5	77	9.7%	79	0.72	6	25.5%
PG
SG
SF
PF				10%		15.3%		66.7		5.9%		0.38		53.3%
C				90%	51	13.3%	22	110.0	87	10.2%	85	0.77	18	22.2%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		2P%			FT%		ASTD% All		ASTD% Rim		ASTD% Mid		ASTD% Three
On Court	04-05	24.1	UTA	820	18	42.4%	18	42.4%		65	73.8%	70	60%	70	54%	34	78%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	16	42.4%	16	42.4%		67	73.8%	70	60%	76	54%	30	78%	0
On Court	03-04	23.1	UTA	248	11	40.0%	13	40.7%	0.0%		81.2%	44	68%	84	50%	12	90%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF				10%		33.3%		33.3%					0%		0%
C				90%	13	40.4%	16	41.2%	0.0%		81.2%	32	71%	70	55%	16	90%	0

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							% of Shot Attempts
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three		Non Corner		All Three
On Court	04-05	24.1	UTA	820	18	42.4%	80	62%	51	23%	35	15%	26	38%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	16	42.4%	77	62%	46	23%	39	15%	24	38%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
On Court	03-04	23.1	UTA	248	11	40.0%	25	33%	79	35%	70	31%	76	65%	0	0%	86	2%	82	2%
PG
SG
SF
PF				10%		33.3%		33%		67%		0%		67%		0%		0%		0%
C				90%	13	40.4%	22	33%	69	33%	74	33%	76	65%	0	0%	84	2%	83	2%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							FG%
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three	Non Corner		All Three
On Court	04-05	24.1	UTA	820	18	42.4%	18	51%	7	21%	63	40%	13	29%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	16	42.4%	21	51%	8	21%	67	40%	16	29%
On Court	03-04	23.1	UTA	248	11	40.0%	89	67%	26	32%	15	24%	12	28%			0%		0%
PG
SG
SF
PF				10%		33.3%		100%		0%				0%
C				90%	13	40.4%	80	65%	43	35%	20	24%	17	29%			0%		0%

Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	FT%
On Court	04-05	24.1	UTA	820	65	73.8%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	67	73.8%
On Court	03-04	23.1	UTA	248		81.2%
PG
SG
SF
PF				10%
C				90%		81.2%

Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	BLK%		STL%		FOUL%		fgOR%		fgDR%		ftOR%		ftDR%
On Court	04-05	24.1	UTA	820	66	2.4%	10	0.6%	10	7.9%	72	10.7%	79	18.6%	76	6.9%	25	20.6%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	55	2.4%	16	0.6%	12	7.9%	67	10.7%	73	18.6%	76	6.9%	22	20.6%
On Court	03-04	23.1	UTA	248	86	3.4%	17	0.8%	17	6.9%	15	6.4%	66	17.5%	0	0.0%	11	16.7%
PG
SG
SF
PF				10%		0.0%		2.0%		2.0%		0.0%		13.8%		0.0%		50.0%
C				90%	84	3.9%	12	0.6%	13	7.4%	16	7.0%	68	18.2%	0	0.0%	9	13.6%

Guide to understanding this table