Vitaly Potapenko /// Stats /// Cleaning the Glass

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

								Offense										Defense
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Diff		Exp W	Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate		Pts/Poss		eFG%		TOV%		ORB%		FT Rate
On Court	05-06	30.6	SAC	9		-54.9	0		56.3		28.6%		25.0%		27.3%		7.1		111.1		62.5%		16.7%		20.0%		41.7
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		-54.9	0		56.3		28.6%		25.0%		27.3%		7.1		111.1		62.5%		16.7%		20.0%		41.7
On Court	05-06	30.6	SEA	315	25	-5.1	28	86	109.9	80	50.4%	53	15.7%	96	35.6%	13	20.7	3	115.0	0	57.6%	75	16.7%	71	28.1%	96	19.6
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	34	-5.1	28	80	109.9	77	50.4%	51	15.7%	95	35.6%	18	20.7	8	115.0	1	57.6%	70	16.7%	70	28.1%	94	19.6
On Court	04-05	29.6	SEA	325	26	-5.5	28	96	112.7	70	49.1%	100	12.2%	32	29.3%	98	32.4	1	118.2	1	54.4%	7	13.4%	84	28.5%	31	27.2
PG
SG
SF
PF				2%		-33.3	0		66.7		50.0%		33.3%		0.0%		0.0		100.0		50.0%		20.0%		50.0%		25.0
C				98%	31	-5.1	29	91	113.4	69	49.1%	97	11.9%	38	29.6%	93	32.8	2	118.5	3	54.5%	7	13.3%	84	28.2%	37	27.2
On Court	03-04	28.6	SEA	1406	37	-3.7	31	93	107.9	98	51.0%	50	16.5%	51	30.5%	16	19.5	3	111.6	4	51.1%	14	14.7%	58	30.2%	40	23.9
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	36	-3.7	31	89	107.9	95	51.0%	43	16.5%	54	30.5%	18	19.5	6	111.6	8	51.1%	14	14.7%	57	30.2%	52	23.9

Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	Usage		PSA		AST%		AST:Usg		TOV%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SAC	9		10.5%		133.3		0.0%		0.00		0.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		10.5%		133.3		0.0%		0.00		0.0%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SEA	315	16	11.4%	35	102.8	20	3.4%	34	0.30	25	18.1%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	20	11.4%	33	102.8	29	3.4%	39	0.30	31	18.1%
On Court	04-05	29.6	SEA	325	31	11.8%	82	142.0	25	4.2%	28	0.36	75	14.8%
PG
SG
SF
PF				2%		11.1%		0.0		0.0%		0.00		0.0%
C				98%	34	11.8%	69	143.8	31	4.3%	35	0.36	73	15.0%
On Court	03-04	28.6	SEA	1406	58	14.0%	30	114.6	42	6.0%	38	0.43	41	18.2%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	60	14.0%	30	114.6	54	6.0%	50	0.43	48	18.2%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		2P%			FT%		ASTD% All		ASTD% Rim		ASTD% Mid		ASTD% Three
On Court	05-06	30.6	SAC	9		66.7%		66.7%					100%				100%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		66.7%		66.7%					100%				100%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SEA	315	47	50.0%	48	50.0%			58.8%	21	75%	25	67%	28	82%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	51	50.0%	51	50.0%			58.8%	22	75%	25	67%	32	82%	0
On Court	04-05	29.6	SEA	325	78	52.4%	82	53.0%	0.0%	98	87.1%	25	73%	68	55%	10	91%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF				2%		0.0%		0.0%
C				98%	76	53.0%	80	53.7%	0.0%	97	87.1%	20	73%	74	55%	13	91%	0
On Court	03-04	28.6	SEA	1406	68	49.1%	68	49.1%		30	64.4%	5	83%	7	75%	14	88%	0
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	64	49.1%	64	49.1%		34	64.4%	5	83%	9	75%	21	88%	0

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							% of Shot Attempts
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three		Non Corner		All Three
On Court	05-06	30.6	SAC	9		66.7%		0%		67%		33%		100%		0%		0%		0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		66.7%		0%		67%		33%		100%		0%		0%		0%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SEA	315	47	50.0%	48	45%	87	39%	43	16%	63	55%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	51	50.0%	43	45%	86	39%	51	16%	65	55%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
On Court	04-05	29.6	SEA	325	78	52.4%	26	32%	88	38%	61	29%	82	67%	85	1%	0	0%	75	1%
PG
SG
SF
PF				2%		0.0%		0%		100%		0%		100%		0%		0%		0%
C				98%	76	53.0%	16	33%	84	37%	67	29%	86	66%	90	1%	0	0%	80	1%
On Court	03-04	28.6	SEA	1406	68	49.1%	27	33%	94	42%	51	24%	81	67%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	64	49.1%	25	33%	93	42%	54	24%	81	67%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%

Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

							FG%
	Year	Age	Team	MIN	eFG%		Rim		Short Mid		Long Mid		All Mid		Corner Three		Non Corner	All Three
On Court	05-06	30.6	SAC	9		66.7%				50%		100%		67%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		66.7%				50%		100%		67%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SEA	315	47	50.0%	11	52%	96	52%	59	40%	95	49%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	51	50.0%	12	52%	91	52%	64	40%	92	49%
On Court	04-05	29.6	SEA	325	78	52.4%	99	81%	61	41%	48	38%	56	39%		0%			0%
PG
SG
SF
PF				2%		0.0%				0%				0%
C				98%	76	53.0%	99	81%	64	42%	50	38%	60	40%		0%			0%
On Court	03-04	28.6	SEA	1406	68	49.1%	39	56%	92	47%	80	43%	93	46%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	64	49.1%	36	56%	91	47%	77	43%	92	46%

Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	FT%		SFLD%		FFLD%		AND1%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SAC	9				0.0%		0.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%				0.0%		0.0%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SEA	315		58.8%	18	8.6%	73	2.1%	0	0.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		58.8%	15	8.6%	64	2.1%	0	0.0%
On Court	04-05	29.6	SEA	325	98	87.1%
PG
SG
SF
PF				2%
C				98%	97	87.1%
On Court	03-04	28.6	SEA	1406	30	64.4%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	34	64.4%

Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.

The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.

	Year	Age	Team	MIN	BLK%		STL%		FOUL%		fgOR%		fgDR%		ftOR%		ftDR%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SAC	9		0.0%		0.0%		15.8%		0.0%		0.0%		0.0%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%		0.0%		0.0%		15.8%		0.0%		0.0%		0.0%
On Court	05-06	30.6	SEA	315	4	0.4%	1	0.3%	44	5.9%	53	9.2%	26	14.0%	0	0.0%	25	21.4%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	4	0.4%	3	0.3%	49	5.9%	46	9.2%	20	14.0%	0	0.0%	25	21.4%
On Court	04-05	29.6	SEA	325	7	0.5%	47	1.0%	21	7.0%	68	10.3%	40	14.7%	0	0.0%	65	33.3%
PG
SG
SF
PF				2%		0.0%		0.0%		11.1%		0.0%		0.0%
C				98%	7	0.5%	55	1.0%	24	6.9%	63	10.5%	39	14.9%	0	0.0%	59	33.3%
On Court	03-04	28.6	SEA	1406	25	1.1%	16	0.7%	56	4.8%	32	7.8%	23	13.4%	0	0.0%	53	28.9%
PG
SG
SF
PF
C				100%	22	1.1%	20	0.7%	58	4.8%	29	7.8%	19	13.4%	0	0.0%	49	28.9%

Guide to understanding this table