SACRAMENTO KINGSSACRAMENTO
Team Efficiency and Four Factors
Team Efficiency and Four Factors
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank for all games played by all teams in that stat for the season.
Gray rows indicate playoff games.
Download this table
| Offense | Defense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Opp | Team Pts |
Opp Pts |
Spread | Pts/Poss | eFG% | TOV% | ORB% | FT Rate | Pts/Poss | eFG% | TOV% | ORB% | FT Rate | ||||||||||||||
| % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | |||||||||
| 11/10/26 | vs. | ORL | L | 100 | 107 | +5.5 | 25 | 105.3 | 63 | 55.4% | 6 | 22.3% | 7 | 18.6% | 62 | 24.3 | 51 | 113.8 | 70 | 50.0% | 48 | 14.9% | 31 | 34.0% | 63 | 18.9 | ||
| 11/08/26 | vs. | MIA | L | 108 | 114 | +11.5 | 37 | 110.3 | 50 | 53.0% | 11 | 20.6% | 84 | 37.8% | 68 | 25.6 | 38 | 117.5 | 18 | 60.2% | 32 | 13.4% | 64 | 27.1% | 98 | 9.1 | ||
| 11/06/26 | vs. | SAS | L | 109 | 124 | +17.5 | 46 | 112.9 | 73 | 57.3% | 62 | 14.1% | 14 | 22.0% | 13 | 13.5 | 6 | 132.9 | 11 | 63.0% | 26 | 12.9% | 57 | 28.6% | 2 | 39.7 | ||
| 11/04/26 | vs. | LAL | L | 103 | 116 | +12.5 | 24 | 105.1 | 10 | 45.6% | 20 | 18.4% | 87 | 38.6% | 56 | 23.3 | 35 | 118.4 | 54 | 52.6% | 19 | 12.2% | 82 | 23.3% | 1 | 43.6 | ||
| 11/02/26 | @ | DAL | W | 115 | 100 | +7.5 | 72 | 121.1 | 92 | 64.0% | 9 | 21.1% | 72 | 35.0% | 9 | 12.2 | 83 | 103.1 | 90 | 45.5% | 65 | 16.7% | 38 | 31.9% | 6 | 37.2 | ||
| 10/31/26 | @ | MEM | L | 105 | 136 | +7.5 | 18 | 103.2 | 22 | 48.7% | 43 | 15.8% | 12 | 20.8% | 84 | 31.2 | 15 | 126.3 | 13 | 62.0% | 65 | 16.8% | 71 | 25.6% | 26 | 27.8 | ||
| 10/29/26 | @ | NOP | L | 120 | 132 | +6.5 | 26 | 105.5 | 77 | 58.0% | 5 | 22.7% | 17 | 22.7% | 34 | 18.4 | 31 | 120.0 | 7 | 64.7% | 71 | 17.3% | 99 | 14.3% | 30 | 25.9 | ||
| 10/27/26 | @ | SAS | L | 103 | 130 | +19.5 | 29 | 106.7 | 50 | 53.0% | 46 | 15.6% | 31 | 26.1% | 4 | 9.6 | 8 | 131.1 | 10 | 63.3% | 18 | 12.2% | 49 | 30.0% | 79 | 15.7 | ||
| 10/25/26 | vs. | MEM | L | 112 | 123 | +3.5 | 44 | 112.2 | 38 | 51.6% | 70 | 13.3% | 64 | 32.1% | 10 | 12.6 | 19 | 124.2 | 62 | 51.6% | 29 | 13.1% | 4 | 43.4% | 35 | 25.0 | ||
| 10/23/26 | vs. | POR | L | 120 | 128 | +9.5 | 47 | 113.3 | 32 | 50.5% | 69 | 13.3% | 30 | 26.0% | 82 | 30.8 | 26 | 121.9 | 35 | 55.8% | 5 | 9.5% | 48 | 30.2% | 44 | 23.2 | ||
| 10/21/26 | @ | LAC | L | 96 | 121 | +5.5 | 6 | 94.7 | 20 | 48.1% | 32 | 17.0% | 16 | 22.4% | 24 | 16.5 | 42 | 115.8 | 12 | 62.7% | 57 | 15.8% | 96 | 16.7% | 22 | 29.6 | ||
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
Click to login
- It includes:
- Team shooting stats by location
- Team and opponent play context stats (transition/half court/putbacks)