Elliot Williams
6'5" point31.8 years old #22 pick in 2010

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Team Efficiency and Four Factors

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Offense Defense
Year Age Team MIN Diff Exp W Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate Pts/Poss eFG% TOV% ORB% FT Rate
On Court 15-16 26.4 MEM 45 -3.7 31 102.4 49.2% 15.7% 17.5% 31.8 106.1 51.3% 17.1% 27.9% 11.8
PG 91% +19.2 77 109.7 50.0% 13.9% 19.4% 33.3 90.5 43.9% 18.9% 29.3% 13.6
SG 9% -195.5 0 54.5 41.7% 27.3% 0.0% 16.7 250.0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 NOP 63 +3.3 50 100.0 49.5% 12.9% 19.4% 8.3 96.7 43.9% 13.2% 26.6% 30.3
PG 6% +104.8 82 171.4 75.0% 14.3% 100.0% 50.0 66.7 28.6% 16.7% 20.0% 0.0
SG 94% -2.8 33 95.4 48.0% 12.8% 16.7% 5.9 98.3 45.1% 13.0% 27.1% 32.6
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 UTA 33 +6.5 58 106.5 47.3% 21.0% 41.2% 23.2 100.0 54.9% 19.0% 23.3% 13.7
PG 25% -26.3 1 73.7 38.5% 26.3% 22.2% 30.8 100.0 43.8% 11.1% 27.3% 25.0
SG 72% +29.1 80 126.8 52.4% 17.1% 47.8% 22.0 97.7 58.8% 22.7% 21.1% 8.8
SF 3% -200.0 0 0.0 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0 200.0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0
PF
C
On Court 13-14 24.4 PHI 1056 3 -18.7 6 3 94.4 4 44.9% 6 18.0% 40 27.4% 58 21.7 8 113.2 12 52.9% 87 17.3% 6 32.4% 5 28.2
PG 7% -36.9 0 83.0 39.2% 19.1% 21.8% 20.0 119.9 56.6% 12.8% 23.4% 25.4
SG 70% 2 -21.7 4 3 92.8 4 44.1% 8 18.0% 48 28.2% 37 20.3 4 114.5 5 53.8% 86 17.5% 4 33.6% 7 27.8
SF 23% 33 -4.2 30 26 103.0 48 49.6% 12 17.3% 22 25.8% 84 26.7 46 107.2 74 48.8% 90 18.2% 19 31.6% 6 29.7
PF 0% -133.3 0 0.0 0.0% 50.0% 75.0% 0.0 133.3 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 200.0
C
On Court 11-12 22.4 POR 98 -1.0 38 102.2 52.9% 14.6% 19.8% 15.3 103.2 49.4% 15.5% 27.4% 20.2
PG 0% 200.0 50.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0
SG 94% +5.7 56 103.4 55.2% 15.4% 18.4% 16.0 97.8 47.1% 15.7% 26.9% 20.3
SF 6% -132.5 0 80.0 26.9% 0.0% 30.0% 7.7 212.5 93.8% 12.5% 0.0% 25.0
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Offensive Overview

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN Usage PSA AST% AST:Usg TOV%
On Court 15-16 26.4 MEM 45 16.3% 66.7 14.3% 0.88 6.9%
PG 91% 13.9% 70.0 11.5% 0.83 0.0%
SG 9% 35.0% 50.0 50.0% 1.43 28.6%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 NOP 63 15.5% 73.7 9.1% 0.59 0.0%
PG
SG 94% 16.7% 73.7 10.0% 0.60 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 UTA 33 16.4% 118.2 15.8% 0.96 16.0%
PG 25% 19.0% 140.0 0.0% 0.00 0.0%
SG 72% 16.3% 100.0 17.6% 1.08 23.5%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 24.4 PHI 1056 45 16.2% 37 103.7 54 10.0% 56 0.62 13 15.3%
PG 7% 17.0% 104.3 5.9% 0.35 18.5%
SG 70% 41 16.5% 54 108.0 41 10.1% 49 0.61 13 16.5%
SF 23% 43 15.3% 11 89.3 65 10.7% 75 0.70 66 10.5%
PF
C
On Court 11-12 22.4 POR 98 24.5% 102.0 9.4% 0.39 6.1%
PG
SG 94% 23.4% 102.3 9.6% 0.41 6.9%
SF 6% 39.3% 100.0 0.0% 0.00 0.0%
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Overall

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN eFG% 2P% 3P% FT% ASTD%
All
ASTD%
Rim
ASTD%
Mid
ASTD%
Three
On Court 15-16 26.4 MEM 45 25.0% 16.7% 25.0% 75.0% 50% 100% 0%
PG 91% 27.8% 20.0% 25.0% 100.0% 50% 100% 0%
SG 9% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 NOP 63 38.9% 40.0% 25.0% 0.0% 33% 50% 0% 50%
PG
SG 94% 38.9% 40.0% 25.0% 0.0% 33% 50% 0% 50%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 UTA 33 60.0% 0.0% 66.7% 50.0% 100% 100%
PG 25% 75.0% 0.0% 66.7% 50.0% 100% 100%
SG 72% 50.0% 0.0% 66.7% 100% 100%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 24.4 PHI 1056 30 46.9% 67 48.9% 12 29.1% 32 75.5% 57 66% 47 59% 34 59% 79 85%
PG 7% 45.5% 30.8% 44.4% 100.0% 50% 0% 0% 100%
SG 70% 45 50.0% 84 52.9% 15 30.0% 11 71.8% 47 67% 38 60% 31 62% 67 88%
SF 23% 4 36.9% 18 40.5% 1 21.4% 82.6% 53 67% 27 67% 24 67% 94 67%
PF
C
On Court 11-12 22.4 POR 98 51.1% 60.7% 23.5% 45.5% 62% 69% 0% 100%
PG
SG 94% 51.2% 66.7% 18.8% 44.4% 63% 75% 0% 100%
SF 6% 50.0% 25.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50% 0% 100%
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Frequency

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
% of Shot Attempts
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid
Long
Mid
All
Mid
Corner
Three
Non
Corner
All
Three
On Court 15-16 26.4 MEM 45 25.0% 9% 9% 45% 55% 9% 27% 36%
PG 91% 27.8% 0% 11% 44% 56% 11% 33% 44%
SG 9% 0.0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 NOP 63 38.9% 21% 5% 32% 37% 11% 32% 42%
PG
SG 94% 38.9% 22% 0% 33% 33% 11% 33% 44%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 UTA 33 60.0% 18% 9% 18% 27% 9% 45% 55%
PG 25% 75.0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 50% 75%
SG 72% 50.0% 17% 17% 17% 33% 0% 50% 50%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 24.4 PHI 1056 30 46.9% 94 48% 27 9% 10 8% 9 17% 31 8% 57 27% 41 35%
PG 7% 45.5% 36% 14% 9% 23% 9% 32% 41%
SG 70% 45 50.0% 94 45% 31 10% 4 8% 10 18% 20 6% 57 30% 41 37%
SF 23% 4 36.9% 91 37% 10 6% 25 14% 8 20% 49 15% 50 28% 53 43%
PF
C
On Court 11-12 22.4 POR 98 51.1% 49% 4% 12% 16% 12% 22% 35%
PG
SG 94% 51.2% 45% 2% 12% 15% 12% 28% 40%
SF 6% 50.0% 60% 0% 20% 20% 20% 0% 20%
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Shooting: Accuracy

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
FG%
Year Age Team MIN eFG% Rim Short
Mid
Long
Mid
All
Mid
Corner
Three
Non
Corner
All
Three
On Court 15-16 26.4 MEM 45 25.0% 0% 20% 17% 0% 33% 25%
PG 91% 27.8% 0% 25% 20% 0% 33% 25%
SG 9% 0.0% 0% 0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 NOP 63 38.9% 50% 33% 33% 50% 17% 25%
PG
SG 94% 38.9% 50% 33% 33% 50% 17% 25%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 UTA 33 60.0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 60% 67%
PG 25% 75.0% 0% 0% 100% 50% 67%
SG 72% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 67% 67%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 24.4 PHI 1056 30 46.9% 39 57% 14 21% 61 39% 14 30% 0 19% 34 32% 11 29%
PG 7% 45.5% 38% 33% 0% 20% 50% 43% 44%
SG 70% 45 50.0% 63 61% 17 23% 90 47% 26 33% 14% 33 33% 14 30%
SF 23% 4 36.9% 11 50% 0 0% 33 33% 6 23% 20% 9 22% 1 21%
PF
C
On Court 11-12 22.4 POR 98 51.1% 62% 100% 50% 57% 33% 18% 24%
PG
SG 94% 51.2% 67% 100% 60% 67% 20% 18% 19%
SF 6% 50.0% 33% 0% 0% 100% 100%
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Foul Drawing

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN FT% SFLD% FFLD% AND1%
On Court 15-16 26.4 MEM 45 75.0% 9.1% 4.5% 0.0%
PG 91% 100.0% 10.0% 3.8% 0.0%
SG 9% 50.0% 0.0% 10.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 NOP 63 0.0% 5.3% 0.8% 0.0%
PG
SG 94% 0.0% 5.3% 0.8% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 UTA 33 50.0% 9.1% 1.3% 0.0%
PG 25% 50.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SG 72% 0.0% 1.9%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 24.4 PHI 1056 32 75.5% 80 12.4% 23 0.7% 29 16.7%
PG 7% 100.0% 4.3% 1.3% 0.0%
SG 70% 11 71.8% 87 13.5% 12 0.5% 38 18.2%
SF 23% 82.6% 73 11.1% 52 1.1% 21 12.5%
PF
C
On Court 11-12 22.4 POR 98 45.5% 10.2% 1.5% 20.0%
PG
SG 94% 44.4% 9.3% 1.6% 25.0%
SF 6% 50.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0%
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table

Defense and Rebounding

Positions are estimated from lineups. Mistakes happen (and some players are very hard to categorize)! If you see anything that looks wrong, please let me know.
The orange/blue numbers show the percentile rank in that stat relative to all players during their time played at that position.
For example, in the PG row stats are compared to all stats for all players when those players were playing PG in a lineup.
Year Age Team MIN BLK% STL% FOUL% fgOR% fgDR% ftOR% ftDR%
On Court 15-16 26.4 MEM 45 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 2.8% 7.1% 0.0% 0.0%
PG 91% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 3.1% 7.3% 0.0%
SG 9% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 NOP 63 0.0% 0.8% 7.8% 0.0% 8.6% 0.0% 0.0%
PG
SG 94% 0.0% 0.8% 8.3% 0.0% 9.4% 0.0% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 14-15 25.4 UTA 33 0.0% 1.3% 1.3% 0.0% 7.1% 0.0% 0.0%
PG 25% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
SG 72% 0.0% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 11.8% 0.0% 0.0%
SF
PF
C
On Court 13-14 24.4 PHI 1056 10 0.1% 60 1.3% 7 4.6% 66 2.7% 11 7.4% 60 1.1% 91 21.3%
PG 7% 0.0% 1.3% 4.4% 2.6% 5.1% 0.0% 14.3%
SG 70% 12 0.1% 28 1.0% 6 4.9% 77 3.0% 16 7.7% 80 1.6% 92 17.9%
SF 23% 17 0.2% 95 2.3% 19 4.1% 36 1.8% 10 7.4% 0 0.0% 95 32.0%
PF
C
On Court 11-12 22.4 POR 98 0.6% 2.0% 7.0% 4.8% 8.9% 0.0% 16.7%
PG
SG 94% 0.6% 2.2% 7.5% 4.1% 9.1% 0.0% 16.7%
SF 6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PF
C
Guide to understanding this table
The rest of this page is for subscribers only.
Already a member?
Click to login
    It includes:
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent shooting by location
  • On/off/position stats for team and opponent play context (transition/half court/putbacks)
Try Insider stats free for one week,
then just $5/month after that
Subscribe Now